by ccpender on Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:09 am
Most obviously, Jefferson is full of contradiction. Like the Sphinx who is part human and part lion, Jefferson seems to be different entities depending on his audience. He often assimilated with his audience; he tried to “please difference constituencies, to avoid conflict with colleagues” (pg. 106). This is noted in his inconsistency and contradictory statements in reference to the Constitution. He pushed for ratification and then opposed it. It is said that when given the choice of candor and courtesy - his choice was courtesy which often left others with the feeling of hypocrisy. In his letters he used the analogy of “taking the handle by the smooth end” to explain his actions. Slavery is one of the biggest contradictions in his life – advocating slavery while being a slaveholder. As I read this book, it reminded me of the poem “The Blind Men and the Elephant” by John Godfry Saxe. As each blind man grabs a different part of the elephant, they each come away with a different impression of what an elephant is. I think this is analogous to Jefferson. Depending on what side of Jefferson is presented, whether it be his ideals on human rights or his actual day-to-day practice, an observer would depart with different perceptions of Jefferson.